Reforms overdue for ethical reviewing
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical?
Review boards responsible for vetting the ethical conduct of research have been criticised for their costliness, unreliability and inappropriate standards when evaluating some non-medical research, but the basic value of mandatory ethical review has not been questioned. When the standards that review boards use to evaluate research proposals are applied to review board practices, it is clear th...
متن کاملSuggestions for Reviewing Texts
مقدمه: یکی از مهمترین مراحل در فرآیند تحقیق، هدایت بررسی متون بصورتی مناسب می باشد. این فرآیند از نظر بیشتر دانشجویان و محققین وظیفه ای سنگین و خطیر است(۱). امروزه با توجه به رشد و توسعه فن آوری اطلاعات، محققین با انفجار اطلاعات مواجه هستند، به نحوی که تقریبا در یک روز ۶۰۰۰ متن علمی جدید منتشر می شود و آگاهیهای علمی تقریبا پس از گذشت هر ۵ سال دو برابر می گردد.
متن کاملA long overdue pleasure
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2012.06.010 Mental Health Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China *correspondence: [email protected] After a protracted 27-year process of formulation, revision and re-revision by numerous psychiatrists, jurists, government administrators and legislators, the Mental Health Law of the People’s Republic of China was finally pas...
متن کاملEuropean Ethical Review Committee: the experience of an international ethics committee reviewing protocols for drug trials.
An international ethics review committee, founded seven years ago, has several unusual features: it selects its own members, who are independent of the drug industry; it includes members with no medical or paramedical background, such as lay people and lawyers; and it reviews protocols together with the study's sponsor. Membership of 31 from nine European countries enables frequent meetings and...
متن کاملSuggestions for reviewing manuscripts.
BACKGROUND Scientific reviewing is a voluntary process to determine if a manuscript deserves publication. REVIEW MEANS: Responsibly Evaluate, Verify and Improve the manuscript, Educate the authors and editors, and Weigh your expert opinion against the submitted work. Provide your review in a respectful, unbiased and timely manner. REVIEW METHODS Make sure editors know about your willingness t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Nature
سال: 2017
ISSN: 0028-0836,1476-4687
DOI: 10.1038/544161d